GPM Global · Public Disclosure · GRI Standards 2021 (Core Option)
Cross-referenced to UNGC CoP 2026 · Reporting Year: Calendar Year 2026
↓ Download Full PDF Report
This report is GPM’s formal sustainability disclosure prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards 2021 (Core Option). It covers operations, impacts, and performance across the calendar year 2026. The report aligns with and supports GPM’s commitment to the United Nations Global Compact, specifically the Ten Principles covering human rights, labor, environment, and anti-corruption. It also documents GPM’s contribution toward the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through business strategy, partnerships, and operational practice.
Source data draw primarily from the 2026 Communication on Progress (CoP) submitted to the UN Global Compact, supplemented by policy documentation and performance metrics. External assurance was conducted on carbon impact data disclosed in Net Positive reporting.
| Reporting Scope | All GPM global operations. No entities or subsidiaries have been excluded. |
| Reporting Period | 1 January 2026 – 31 December 2026 |
| Reporting Frequency | Annual |
| Alignment | GRI Standards 2021 (Core Option); UNGC Ten Principles; SDGs; TNFD; SBTi; IFRS S2 |
| Contact | GPM Global · 41592 Orianna Lane, Novi, MI 48375, USA · |
GPM Global (Green Project Management Global) is headquartered in Novi, Michigan, USA, and operates through partnerships, accredited training providers, and certified professionals across more than 55 countries. The organization works across four primary areas: education and training, consulting and capacity building, standards development, and advocacy and policy engagement. GPM’s client base includes private corporations, NGOs, universities, and government institutions. The stated purpose is to embed sustainability and regenerative principles into how projects are governed, planned, and delivered.
GPM’s stated mission is to equip organizations and professionals with the tools and competencies to deliver projects that generate measurable social, environmental, and economic outcomes. Strategic alignment is maintained with the SDGs, TNFD, SBTi, and IFRS S2.
| Board of Directors: Strategic oversight; approves all sustainability and ethics policies; evaluates performance against sustainability and ethics objectives. |
| Executive Leadership Team: Implements board strategy; manages operational delivery of the sustainability strategy, including P5 Standard and Environmental Regeneration Policy. |
| Advisory and Technical Committees: External experts and regional representatives advising on standards alignment across UNGC, SBTi, GRI, and TNFD. |
| Over 50% of leadership roles held by women. |
| Zero incidents of forced or child labor reported. |
| 100% ethics and human rights training completion. |
| 100% of suppliers adhering to GPM’s Human Rights and Anti-Trafficking Policy. |
| United Nations Global Compact (member since 2012) |
| Project Management Institute (PMI) — Joint Venture, established 2025 |
| Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) — Joint Leadership Program, established 2025 |
| United Nations Business for Peace Initiative |
| Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) |
Source: CoP 2026; GRI 2-1 to 2-7, 2-28
GPM’s three-tier governance model is structured to maintain accountability across business activities. The Board of Directors provides independent oversight, approves policies, and evaluates performance against sustainability and ethics objectives. The Executive Leadership Team manages operational delivery, including implementation of the P5 Standard and Environmental Regeneration Policy. Advisory and Technical Committees provide external expert input on evolving standards and stakeholder expectations. Board performance is evaluated annually and summarized in the Governance Scorecard, published alongside the Communication on Progress.
| Training and Awareness: 100% of employees, contractors, and suppliers completed annual ethics and anti-corruption training, which includes scenario-based components and formal reporting procedures. |
| Whistleblower Protections: Framework remained operational in 2026. Anonymous reports submitted through third-party portal. Investigations managed by an independent compliance officer, reviewed by the Board’s Ethics Committee. Regional language accessibility added in 2026. |
| Conflict-of-Interest Declarations: Annual disclosures required from all staff, partners, and suppliers as a condition of continued engagement. |
| Enforcement Actions: No confirmed incidents of corruption or non-compliance recorded in 2026. Summary of compliance results disclosed annually in the Governance Scorecard. |
All client projects exceeding USD 1 million include participatory governance and sustainability oversight requirements. The Governance Scorecard and policy updates are publicly accessible. Annual third-party assurance of carbon impact data is conducted by an accredited external auditor. In 2026, ethical performance indicators were formally integrated into employee evaluation criteria.
Source: CoP 2026; GRI 2-9, 2-13, 2-14, 2-23–2-27, 205-2, 205-3
GPM’s engagement is structured around three operational principles: Inclusivity (all stakeholder groups, including those with limited institutional voice, have access to GPM’s governance processes); Transparency (open access to policy documents, impact data, and governance outcomes); and Reciprocity (engagement treated as a two-way exchange that shapes both GPM’s strategy and stakeholders’ own sustainability capacity). Engagement is embedded in project delivery, governance reviews, and policy development, through formal surveys, collaborative program development, partnership initiatives, and participation in global forums.
Stakeholder feedback directly influenced governance and program decisions in 2026. Partner and client input informed a further update to the Ethics and Workplace Integrity Policy. University and industry partners contributed to curriculum refinements in the Regenerative Leadership Program. Feedback from UN Global Compact peers led to expanded reporting on Scope 3 emissions and biodiversity metrics in the 2026 CoP. Stakeholder input is consolidated annually through the Governance Scorecard and used to set priorities for the following reporting cycle.
In 2027, GPM plans to introduce digital collaboration platforms for global partner consultation, expand regional representation in advisory committees, and formalize an annual Stakeholder Forum to review material topics and performance data.
Source: CoP 2026; GRI 2-29
Material topics are defined as the environmental, social, and governance issues that carry the most significant impact on people and the environment through GPM’s operations, and that are most relevant to stakeholder decision-making. The process follows four steps: Identification (drawing on UNGC, GRI, SDGs, TNFD, SBTi, and IFRS S2 combined with input from employees, partners, clients, and advisory bodies); Prioritization (evaluating each issue against significance of GPM’s direct or indirect impact and degree of stakeholder concern); Validation by the Executive Leadership Team and Advisory Committee; and Annual Review alongside the UNGC Communication on Progress and governance scorecard cycle.
| Climate Action and Regeneration: Net Positive Carbon Impact maintained in 2026. Operational footprint reduced 4.5% year-over-year. Carbon removal programs continued under the Environmental Regeneration Policy. All data externally verified. Scope 3 reduction disclosure expanded in alignment with TNFD, SBTi, and IFRS S2. |
| Human Rights and Labor: 100% vendor compliance with GPM’s Human Rights and Anti-Trafficking Policy. All employees completed labor and human rights training within 90 days of onboarding. No incidents of forced, bonded, or child labor reported. |
| Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Women held more than 50% of leadership positions. Zero-tolerance policy on discrimination enforced; equal-pay practices maintained across all employment categories. |
| Anti-Corruption: No confirmed incidents of corruption recorded in 2026. Mandatory training, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and whistleblower framework remained operational. Regional language accessibility added to the anonymous reporting portal. |
| Education and Knowledge Sharing: Professional certifications and open-access materials delivered across 25+ countries. Regenerative Leadership Program continued developing systems-based sustainability competencies. P5 Standard and PRiSM integrated into more than 20 university curricula. |
| Digital Sustainability and Responsible AI: Responsible AI Policy operationalized across all internal functions in 2026. 100% of internal digital infrastructure operates on low-energy, ethically sourced platforms. Digital sustainability training extended to client-facing roles. |
GPM will continue refining its materiality process by integrating stakeholder input through an annual Global Sustainability Forum, expanding reporting on biodiversity regeneration and circular economy outcomes, and publishing a Materiality Matrix in future reports.
Source: CoP 2026; GRI 3-1, 3-2, 3-3
| Anti-Corruption: Zero-tolerance policy enforced through Ethics and Workplace Integrity Policy. 100% training completion. Whistleblower framework active with expanded language access. No confirmed incidents of corruption or non-compliance recorded in 2026. |
| Economic Impact: GPM does not publish financial statements publicly. Impact measured through knowledge transfer, client capacity building, and market-level change toward sustainable project delivery. PMI Joint Venture and IMA Joint Leadership Program continued operation through 2026; P5 Standard reach expanded into new institutional partnerships. |
| Workforce Equality (GRI 405, 406): More than 50% of leadership positions held by women. Zero incidents of discrimination, harassment, or labor rights violations recorded in 2026. Equal pay and inclusive advancement practices codified in the Employment and Labor Rights Policy. |
| Human Rights (GRI 409): 100% of suppliers required to adhere to Human Rights and Anti-Trafficking Policy. No cases of forced, bonded, or child labor identified in 2026. All staff receive human rights training within 90 days of onboarding. |
| Freedom of Association (GRI 407): Guaranteed through policy and supplier contracts across all jurisdictions where GPM operates. |
| Training and Education (GRI 404): Open-access sustainability education delivered through the P5 Standard and PRiSM methodology. Regenerative Leadership Program trained professionals across 25+ countries in 2026. All frameworks available online. |
| Supplier Social Assessment (GRI 414): 100% of vendors and partners assessed against social and environmental criteria. Suppliers unable to meet policy requirements required to remediate or risk contract termination. |
| Publish biodiversity regeneration and climate resilience indicators aligned with the P5 framework. |
| Introduce Impact-per-Project reporting under GRI 203 (Indirect Economic Impacts). |
| Integrate planetary boundaries metrics into project certification criteria. |
Source: CoP 2026; GRI 3-3, 201, 205, 301, 304, 305, 308, 404–409, 414, 417
Prepared in accordance with GRI Standards 2021: Core Option. Page references correspond to this report unless otherwise noted; “CoP” references the 2026 UNGC Communication on Progress Report.
| United Nations Global Compact (Ten Principles) |
| Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) |
| Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) |
| Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) |
| IFRS S2 Climate-Related Disclosure Standard |
| GRI Standards (2021) |
Assurance Statement: External assurance was conducted on GPM’s carbon impact and Net Positive data by an independent third party. All other data have been internally verified by the GPM Governance Committee.
GPM Global · 41592 Orianna Lane, Novi, MI 48375 USA ·
GPM Global · Public Disclosure
Cross-referenced to UNGC CoP 2025 and GRI 2021 Report
| Legal Name | GPM Global (Green Project Management Global) |
| Headquarters | Novi, Michigan, United States |
| Reporting Year | 2024 |
| Reporting Cycle | Annual |
| Primary Activities | Education, consulting, and certification in sustainable and regenerative project management. |
| Geographic Coverage | Active in over 55 countries through partnerships, training programs, and global networks. |
| Reporting Boundary | All operations, offices, and directly controlled training and consulting engagements. |
| Contact |
Source: UNGC CoP p. 6, GRI Section 2
| The Board of Directors provides oversight of sustainability and climate-related performance through quarterly reviews and the annual Governance Scorecard. |
| The Executive Leadership Team manages operational implementation of climate goals, including the Net Positive Commitment and Environmental Regeneration Policy. |
| Climate performance metrics are embedded into annual objectives and reviewed by the Board. |
| The President and CEO, Dr. Joel Carboni, is accountable for delivery of climate objectives. |
| Sustainability responsibilities are delegated to the Executive Leadership Team and the Advisory Committee on Regeneration and Climate. |
| Climate targets are embedded in corporate policies and risk management. |
| Ethical oversight, anti-corruption measures, and climate transparency form part of annual compliance audits. |
Source: CoP pp. 3, 7, 12; GRI Sections 3.1–3.3
| Rising global demand for climate-literate project professionals and ESG-integrated delivery methods. |
| Growth in partnerships across academia and professional bodies (e.g., PMI, IMA). |
| Expansion of Regenerative Leadership training as a scalable business opportunity. |
| Risks are assessed annually during strategic planning. |
| GPM applies the P5 framework (People, Planet, Prosperity, Process, Product) to assess environmental and social dependencies in all major projects. |
Source: CoP pp. 5, 13–17; GRI Section 5
Climate change and sustainability are integral to GPM’s organizational purpose.
| Climate and regeneration objectives are embedded in GPM’s corporate mission. |
| The Environmental Regeneration Policy mandates net positive carbon impact and ecosystem restoration. |
| All consulting engagements are evaluated using the P5 Standard to identify and mitigate negative environmental impacts. |
| Achieve and maintain Net Positive Carbon Impact beyond 2025. |
| Expand training on climate resilience and regenerative development. |
| Enhance data transparency through TNFD and IFRS S2 disclosures. |
| Climate objectives drive investment in digital sustainability infrastructure and education programs. |
| Strategic partnerships (PMI, IMA) align revenue growth with global demand for low-carbon and ESG-integrated systems. |
Source: CoP pp. 5–6, 19–21; GRI Section 6.1
| 1,400 tCO₂e removed via direct air capture and reforestation projects. |
| Third-party assurance completed for all emissions data. |
| Scope 3 reduction of 18% year-over-year. |
Source: CoP p. 19; GRI Section 6.2
| Organizational boundary follows the equity share approach consistent with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard. |
| Scope 3 emissions include supply chain, digital infrastructure, and partner operations. |
| Carbon accounting independently assured by an accredited third party. |
| Verified data disclosed publicly in the annual Net Positive Impact Report. |
Source: CoP pp. 5, 19; GRI 305-1 to 305-5
Source: CoP p. 19; GRI Section 6.2
| All internal digital and operational infrastructure transitioned to low-energy, ethically sourced systems. |
| Data centers powered by renewable energy suppliers. |
| Energy data to be integrated into 2026 reporting cycle (currently qualitative disclosure). |
Source: CoP p. 8; GRI Section 6.2
| Maintain Net Positive Carbon position annually. |
| Support partner organizations in achieving circular certification and Scope 3 tracking. |
| Publish the Regenerative Carbon Methodology Framework in 2026. |
Source: CoP pp. 19–21; GRI Section 6.2
| Third-party assurance completed by an accredited verifier for all carbon impact and emissions data. |
| Assurance statement included in GRI Content Index. |
| Internal verification by the GPM Governance Committee for social and labor metrics. |
Source: CoP p. 5; GRI Section 7
| GPM currently does not maintain an internal carbon price but intends to establish one by 2026 for use in project evaluations and training simulations. |
| Evaluation ongoing through the P5 Economic Prosperity Lens. |
Source: GRI Section 6.5
| Supplier Engagement: 100% compliance with Human Rights and Anti-Trafficking Policy. |
| Client Engagement: Integration of climate criteria into all project delivery frameworks. |
| Public Policy Engagement: Signatory to UN Global Compact and UN Business for Peace Initiative. |
| Stakeholder Outreach: Training in 25+ countries; partnerships with PMI, IMA, and academic institutions. |
Source: CoP pp. 13–21; GRI Section 4
GPM Global — 2025 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Net Positive Impact Data
This verification statement covers the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon removal data disclosed by GPM Global (Green Project Management Global) for the reporting period 1 January – 31 December 2025. The verification includes direct (Scope 1), indirect (Scope 2), and other indirect (Scope 3) emissions, as well as the carbon removal activities contributing to GPM’s Net Positive Carbon Impact claim.
Verification was conducted in accordance with the following frameworks and protocols:
| ISO 14064-3:2019 — Greenhouse Gas Verification and Validation |
| GHG Protocol: Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) |
| GRI 305: Emissions (2021) |
| CDP 2025 Climate Disclosure Guidance |
| IFRS S2 Climate-Related Disclosures (2023) |
| Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) Guidance |
GPM’s reporting boundary follows the equity-share approach under the GHG Protocol and includes all offices, staff, and controlled consulting and training operations globally. Verification activities considered the principles of relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
| Reviewed documented methodologies, calculation spreadsheets, and emission factors. |
| Assessed boundaries and classification of Scopes 1, 2, and 3. |
| Conducted interviews with responsible staff. |
| Examined evidence supporting reported carbon-removal projects (direct air capture and reforestation). |
| Checked consistency between disclosed data and supporting records. |
| Evaluated conformance with stated methodologies. |
Based on the verification procedures performed, we conclude with limited assurance that the 2025 GHG emissions and removal data for GPM Global are free from material misstatement and have been prepared in accordance with the referenced standards.
No material discrepancies were identified during verification. Minor recommendations were made to strengthen Scope 2 energy data collection and supplier-level emission factors.
This engagement was performed to a limited assurance level, suitable for CDP and GRI reporting purposes. All verifiers met ISO 14065 competence and independence criteria.
GPM Global · CDP 2025 Climate Change Report · Reporting Year 2024 · Published April 2026 ·
GPM Global · Public Disclosure · GRI Standards 2021 (Core Option)
Cross-referenced to UNGC CoP 2025 · Reporting Year: Calendar Year 2025
↓ Download Full PDF Report
This report is GPM’s formal sustainability report prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards 2021 (Core Option). It covers activities, impacts, and performance across calendar year 2025. This report aligns with GPM’s commitment to the United Nations Global Compact and reflects GPM’s contribution toward advancing the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through business strategy, partnerships, and practice.
The report draws from the 2025 Communication on Progress (CoP) to the UN Global Compact and includes supplementary data, policies, and performance metrics. External assurance was conducted for carbon impact data disclosed in Net Positive reporting.
| Reporting Scope | All GPM operations globally. No entities or subsidiaries excluded. |
| Reporting Frequency | Annual |
| Contact | GPM Global · 41592 Orianna Lane, Novi, MI 48375, USA · |
GPM Global (Green Project Management Global) is the world leader in sustainable and regenerative project management, founded with the mission to decouple economic growth from social and environmental degradation. Headquartered in Novi, Michigan, USA, GPM operates globally through partnerships, accredited training providers, and certified professionals in more than 55 countries.
Mission: Equip organizations and professionals with the knowledge, tools, and competencies to deliver projects that create social, environmental, and economic value.
Vision: A world where projects are vehicles for regeneration, contributing to planetary health, human dignity, and long-term prosperity.
| Board of Directors: Strategic oversight; approves sustainability and ethics policies; annual performance review. |
| Executive Leadership Team: Implements board strategy; oversees operations; drives sustainability integration. |
| Advisory and Technical Committees: External experts and regional representatives advising on standards alignment and stakeholder engagement. |
| Over 50% of leadership roles held by women. |
| Zero incidents of forced or child labor reported. |
| All staff completed human rights and labor rights training within 90 days of onboarding. |
| 100% of suppliers adhere to GPM’s Human Rights and Anti-Trafficking Policy. |
| United Nations Global Compact (since 2012) |
| Project Management Institute (PMI) — Joint Venture (2025) |
| Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) — Joint Leadership Program (2025) |
| United Nations Business for Peace Initiative |
| Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) |
Source: CoP pp. 6, 14, 19, 21; GRI 2-1 to 2-7, 2-28
| Training: 100% of employees, contractors, and suppliers completed annual ethics and anti-corruption training. Tracked and verified. |
| Whistleblower Framework: Formal non-retaliation framework introduced in 2025. Anonymous reporting via secure third-party portal. Investigations managed by an independent compliance officer, reviewed by the Board’s Ethics Committee. |
| Conflict-of-Interest: Annual disclosures required from all staff, partners, and suppliers as a condition of engagement. |
| Enforcement Actions: No confirmed incidents of corruption recorded in 2025. Summary of substantiated violations and corrective actions included in annual governance report. |
| Ethics training expanded to cover digital ethics and AI governance. |
| Whistleblower process enhanced with regional language accessibility. |
| Ethical performance indicators integrated into employee evaluations. |
Source: CoP pp. 3, 7, 10, 12; GRI 2-9, 2-13, 2-14, 2-23–2-27, 205-2, 205-3
GPM’s engagement approach is guided by three principles: Inclusivity (ensuring all stakeholder groups can contribute); Transparency (open access to policy documents, impact data, and governance outcomes); and Reciprocity (treating engagement as a continuous exchange that informs GPM’s strategy and stakeholders’ capacity to act).
Source: CoP pp. 13, 15, 21; GRI 2-29
GPM follows a four-step process: Identification (reviewing global frameworks including UNGC, GRI, SDGs, TNFD, SBTi, and IFRS S2, and gathering stakeholder input); Prioritization (evaluating significance of GPM’s impact and degree of stakeholder concern); Validation (by Executive Leadership and Advisory Committee); and Annual Review (alongside the UNGC CoP and governance scorecard).
Source: CoP pp. 13–17; GRI 3-1, 3-2
| Anti-Corruption: Zero-tolerance policy enforced. 100% training completion. No confirmed incidents in 2025. Whistleblower framework launched. |
| Economic Impact: Joint Venture with PMI launched, expanding global access to sustainable project methodologies. Joint Leadership Program with IMA integrates sustainability into financial decision-making. |
| Workforce Equality: >50% of leadership positions held by women. Zero incidents of discrimination or labor rights violations. Equal pay enforced. |
| Human Rights: 100% of suppliers required to adhere to GPM’s Human Rights and Anti-Trafficking Policy. No cases of forced, bonded, or child labor in 2025. |
| Freedom of Association: Guaranteed through policy and supplier contracts. |
| Training and Education: Global training delivered across 25 countries. Regenerative Leadership Program launched 2025. P5 Standard and PRiSM open-access worldwide. |
| Supplier Assessment: 100% of vendors assessed against social and environmental criteria. Non-compliant suppliers required to remediate or risk contract termination. |
| Publish biodiversity regeneration and climate resilience indicators aligned with the P5 framework. |
| Introduce Impact-per-Project reporting under GRI 203 (Indirect Economic Impacts). |
| Integrate planetary boundaries metrics into project certification criteria. |
| Publish a Materiality Matrix visual for increased transparency. |
Source: CoP pp. 4–5, 7–10, 14–21; GRI 3-3, 201, 205, 301, 304, 305, 308, 404–409, 414, 417
Prepared in accordance with GRI Standards 2021: Core Option. “CoP” references the 2025 UNGC Communication on Progress Report.
| United Nations Global Compact (Ten Principles) |
| Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) |
| Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) |
| Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) |
| IFRS S2 Climate-Related Disclosure Standard |
| GRI Standards (2021) |
Assurance Statement: External assurance was conducted on GPM’s carbon impact and Net Positive data by an independent third party. All other data have been internally verified by the GPM Governance Committee.
GPM Global · 41592 Orianna Lane, Novi, MI 48375 USA ·
GPM Global · Public Disclosure · 2025
UN Global Compact Communication on Progress → GRI Standards 2021 → CDP Climate Disclosure (2025)
GPM Global · 2025 Disclosure Framework Crosswalk · Published April 2026 ·
GPM Global · Member Since 2013 · First Project Management Organization to Join
A Legacy of Leadership in Sustainable Project Management™
Since 2013, GPM has been an active member of the UN Global Compact — the first project management organization to join this global initiative. Over more than a decade, GPM has embedded the Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact across project governance, decision-making, and professional standards, making sustainable and ethical practice a core requirement of how projects are planned and delivered.
The UN Global Compact, launched in 2000, is the world’s largest corporate sustainability initiative, bringing together businesses, UN agencies, civil society, and governments to advance a more just, sustainable, and resilient global economy. With over 4,100 participating companies across more than 100 countries, it drives collective action to align corporate strategy with broader UN goals including the Sustainable Development Goals.
The Ten Principles are derived from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the UN Convention Against Corruption. They enjoy universal consensus and define the minimum threshold for responsible business conduct.
We encourage all organizations to pledge their support for these ten principles and integrate them into project governance, procurement, and organizational policy.
GPM Global · Carbon Impact Report · 2024 & 2025 Results
2024 & 2025 Actuals — Disclosed
GPM’s direct carbon footprint is not large. We do not operate extensive facilities or industrial operations. The majority of our emissions come from business travel, digital infrastructure, and purchased goods. That is common for service-based organizations of our size and structure.
We do not treat that as a reason to set a lower bar. There are hundreds of thousands of organizations in a similar position that assume their footprint is too small to matter. Our view is that this is precisely why leadership from smaller, service-based organizations is necessary — to demonstrate that net positive impact is achievable at any scale and to set a replicable standard for others.

GPM’s emissions are small relative to large industrial organizations. That is not the point. The point is that there are hundreds of thousands of service-based businesses that have concluded their footprint is too small to warrant serious action. That conclusion is wrong — and it is one that organizations like GPM are positioned to challenge through demonstrated practice rather than advocacy.
Achieving net positive status in 2025 demonstrates that a digitally operated, globally distributed professional services organization can remove more carbon than it produces. The case for inaction among similarly structured organizations is harder to sustain when the result is on the record.
We invite our partners, stakeholders, and peers to go beyond neutrality. Net positive impact is achievable at any scale. The 2025 result is the evidence.